Live · The Road to Autonomy Indices
.RCI · Robotaxi Confidence Index 51.0 ▼ +0.1 .ADLCI · Autonomous Driving Licensing Confidence Index 36.0 ▼ +0.3 .ATCI · Autonomous Trucks Confidence Index 41.7 ▼ +0.4 .DCI · Delivery Bots Confidence Index 53.7 ▲ +0.4 WaymoUS 77.9 ▲ +0.6 Baidu Apollo GoCN 75.6 ▼ -5.3 NeolixCN 68.7 ▲ +5.6 Starship TechnologiesEE 67.9 ▼ -6.5 Pony.aiCN 63.2 ▲ +2.0 Serve RoboticsUS 61.0 ▲ +1.2 KodiakUS 56.4 – 0.0 AuroraUS 55.7 ▲ +7.2 WeRideCN 55.4 ▼ -1.9 CocoUS 50.9 ▼ -5.0 Applied IntuitionUS 50.8 ▲ +2.3 MobileyeIL 45.3 ▲ +6.1 XPengCN 43.1 ▲ +6.1 TeslaUS 42.5 ▼ -0.5 Volvo Autonomous SolutionsSE 42.1 ▲ +0.5 Bot AutoUS 42.0 ▲ +6.3 Didi Autonomous DrivingCN 40.5 ▼ -6.9 DoorDash DotUS 40.3 ▲ +6.6 ZooxUS 38.0 ▲ +2.3 MomentaCN 37.2 ▲ +4.1 MeituanCN 34.7 ▼ -0.4 DeepRoute.aiCN 34.6 ▼ -4.4 Cao Cao MobilityCN 33.7 ▼ -9.0 May MobilityUS 33.7 ▲ +1.1 MotionalUS 32.7 ▲ +0.8 Avride PodUS 31.3 ▲ +2.1 TorcUS 30.6 ▲ +2.5 WaabiCA 29.8 ▼ -8.8 AvrideUS 29.5 ▲ +1.2 WayveGB 28.9 ▲ +0.9 MOIA AmericaDE 27.0 ▼ -2.6 VerneHR 23.8 ▼ -0.5 AutobrainsIL 21.6 ▼ -0.2 Stack AVUS 20.8 ▼ -1.3 NuroUS 19.6 ▲ +1.0 Helm.aiUS 17.5 – 0.0 PlusAIUS 17.4 ▼ -0.4 Tensor AutoUS 14.9 ▼ -7.5 HUMAINSA 2.1 – 0.0 .RCI · Robotaxi Confidence Index 51.0 ▼ +0.1 .ADLCI · Autonomous Driving Licensing Confidence Index 36.0 ▼ +0.3 .ATCI · Autonomous Trucks Confidence Index 41.7 ▼ +0.4 .DCI · Delivery Bots Confidence Index 53.7 ▲ +0.4 WaymoUS 77.9 ▲ +0.6 Baidu Apollo GoCN 75.6 ▼ -5.3 NeolixCN 68.7 ▲ +5.6 Starship TechnologiesEE 67.9 ▼ -6.5 Pony.aiCN 63.2 ▲ +2.0 Serve RoboticsUS 61.0 ▲ +1.2 KodiakUS 56.4 – 0.0 AuroraUS 55.7 ▲ +7.2 WeRideCN 55.4 ▼ -1.9 CocoUS 50.9 ▼ -5.0 Applied IntuitionUS 50.8 ▲ +2.3 MobileyeIL 45.3 ▲ +6.1 XPengCN 43.1 ▲ +6.1 TeslaUS 42.5 ▼ -0.5 Volvo Autonomous SolutionsSE 42.1 ▲ +0.5 Bot AutoUS 42.0 ▲ +6.3 Didi Autonomous DrivingCN 40.5 ▼ -6.9 DoorDash DotUS 40.3 ▲ +6.6 ZooxUS 38.0 ▲ +2.3 MomentaCN 37.2 ▲ +4.1 MeituanCN 34.7 ▼ -0.4 DeepRoute.aiCN 34.6 ▼ -4.4 Cao Cao MobilityCN 33.7 ▼ -9.0 May MobilityUS 33.7 ▲ +1.1 MotionalUS 32.7 ▲ +0.8 Avride PodUS 31.3 ▲ +2.1 TorcUS 30.6 ▲ +2.5 WaabiCA 29.8 ▼ -8.8 AvrideUS 29.5 ▲ +1.2 WayveGB 28.9 ▲ +0.9 MOIA AmericaDE 27.0 ▼ -2.6 VerneHR 23.8 ▼ -0.5 AutobrainsIL 21.6 ▼ -0.2 Stack AVUS 20.8 ▼ -1.3 NuroUS 19.6 ▲ +1.0 Helm.aiUS 17.5 – 0.0 PlusAIUS 17.4 ▼ -0.4 Tensor AutoUS 14.9 ▼ -7.5 HUMAINSA 2.1 – 0.0
Autonomy Economy The Road to Autonomy Autonomy Signals Autonomy Markets Autonomy Indices Confidence Indices
Waymo Via Autonomous Truck - The Road to Autonomy

Waymo Via Shutdown: The End of the Universal Driver?

Chuck Price, President, AI Kinetics joined Grayson Brulte on The Road to Autonomy podcast to discuss the shutdown of Waymo Via and what it means for the development of the universal driver.

The conversation begins with Chuck sharing his thoughts on the current state of the autonomous trucking industry.

We are going through change. What we’re seeing is the early phase of this development which was largely science doing science, now moving to doing engineering and commercialization. Some of the companies that have been involved in this thought ahead for that and are prepared and others are struggling or have struggled.

What we are seeing is a consolidation and some changes in strategy that I think are normal and healthy for an industry as complex as this.

– Chuck Price

The consolidation currently occurring in the autonomous trucking industry is healthy — the market is functioning properly. On Wednesday, July 26th, Alphabet announced Waymo will be shutting down their autonomous trucking division — Waymo Via. While this may have come as a surprise to many, there were rumors in the market and public statements by Alphabet on earnings calls that laid the foundation for this announcement.

Waymo did the right thing for a lot of reasons.

– Chuck Price

By shutting down Waymo Via, Waymo is now going to focus exclusively on their robotaxi business — Waymo One. As Mr. Price stated, this is indeed the right thing for Waymo to do as they are in a head-to-head competition with Cruise. Cruise is a formidable opponent with the resources to compete. Not to mention, Cruise is currently expanding at a much more rapid pace than Waymo. Cruise is in the driver’s seat, while Waymo follows behind.

From a technical perspective, was this an admission by Waymo that the Universal Driver did not work as they expected? Or is this more inancial discipline coming from Waymo as the division will have a new de facto CEO on September 1st — Ruth Porat, President & Chief Investment Officer of Alphabet. In her new role Ms. Porat will be responsible for investments in Alphabet’s “Other Bets”.

To further streamline the business and appease Wall Street, could Ms. Porat look to license the Waymo driver to global OEMs? Or raise additional capital outside by collateralizing Waymo’s IP? Aurora Innovation with 1,450 patents related to autonomy recently raised $820 million in new capital.

I am confident that the formal IP developed by Aurora gave them a huge advantage when they went to raise money, and without that they probably would not have been able to raise.

– Chuck Price

Even though Aurora recently raised $820 million in new capital, the company has a cash burn rate of $45.3 million a month. It’s expensive to operate, Aurora. With Waymo signaling that the Universal Driver did not work, Aurora continues ahead with developing their version of the Universal Driver.

Would Aurora be wise to shut down their passenger car business and focus solely on autonomous trucking? This decision would allow Aurora to streamline their business and lower their cash burn rate — the economics point the way forward. But the question remains, what path will Aurora choose as the company matures and grows?

I haven’t seen a Universal Virtual Driver yet, but I have seen focused drivers come to fruition. We’ve seen cars that are now self-driving without safety drivers. We’ve seen trucks that are self-driving without safety drivers. Both have been achieved. The science is done for those specific use cases.

– Chuck Price

To scale an autonomous trucking startup, the startup has to have a production relationship with a truck OEM. To achieve this relationship, the autonomous trucking startup will have to commit $50 to $100 million to the relationship.

Wrapping up the conversation, Chuck shares his thoughts on how he sees the autonomous trucking industry evolving over the next five years.

The Road to Autonomy
Robotaxi Index
Live · Updated 06:00 UTC
RankOperatorComposite Score
01
Waymo
$GOOGL (Parent)UberLyft
77.9/100
▲ +0.67-Day
▲ +0.830-Day
Composite Factors
Operations78
Scale95
Revenue85
Commercial74
Manufacturing23
Safety87
OMEGA's Take

Waymo ranks #1 in The Road to Autonomy Robotaxi Index with a composite score of 77.9, anchored by 11 commercial cities and 100 million real-world fully autonomous miles driven on public roads as of August 26, 2026. Alphabet reported $382 million in revenue for the Other Bets segment in Q2 2026, while weekly operations reached 500,000 paid rides by mid-2026 across markets including Atlanta, Austin, and San Francisco.

Composite History
174 Snapshots
View Waymo Index Profile →
Operator AUTNMY AICalculated By OMEGAMethodology v1.3Sealed 06:00 UTC · 2026-08-26Leaf d840d52c52631279Cadence 12HEmbed
The future is bright. The future is autonomous. The future is The Road to Autonomy.

Subscribe to This Week in The Autonomy Economy™

Join institutional investors and industry leaders who read This Week in The Autonomy Economy every Sunday. Each edition delivers exclusive insight and commentary on the autonomy economy, helping you stay ahead of what's next.